First. let me say that I will not be asking for donations, nor will I try to sell you anyhing. I firmly believe that Ultrawave Theory represents the true nature of reality, and that everyone should have the opportunity to learn about it for free. I believe that I will be rewarded in other ways for all of the hard work that went into developing this theory. Its undenieable simplicity and power are just too important to keep restricted in any way.

The problem with knowledge is that it colors one's thinking, whether or not that knowledge is right or wrong. What professional and amateur physicists don't realize is that the Standard Model is wrong about several key items, which skew the perspectives of those who believe in it. After I have proven that things aren't what we have been told they are, you might be able to look at an alternative objectively. To circumvent the escape route of disbelief before examination, this website is dedicated to showing material that is contrary to the Standard Model's explanations of how our universe operates without giving an alternative reason up front. No mention of what ultrawave theory is based upon will need to be given until after you have examined the last four pages on this website. Of course, if you are truly open to new ideas then by all means go ahead and look at the theory.

To prove the point of how your knowledge base has affected you, when reading the above paragraph, many of you had already made up your mind that this must be a bunch of hooey (to put it mildly). You didn't even have a reason, as no information has been imparted to you, it was just a natural reaction to someone telling you that there is a problem with your belief system. Most people don't actively seek out and evaluate anything that disagrees with their current beliefs. I assure you that I would never have believed this either if I had not discovered it for myself. All I did was ask a couple of questions that shouldn't have been asked, and when I solved the equations that were required by these "silly" questions the answers all came out right. From the answers to these questions about the nature of matter and energy, an entirely new view of the Universe emerged that made much more sense than what I had previously believed (what I had learned through the normal physics channels). If you can put your prejudices behind you and examine ultrawaves, I believe that you will begin to understand what it is that I discovered. Even though I developed this theory after learning that the questions did have realistic answers, I still don't understand all of the implications of the equations. Some aspects of the theory I can only speculate about, so I hope that my proposals are close to reality.

Several pages of proof that support findings that are contrary to the Standard Model (SM) are available on the left. They are things that I knew must be true if what I discovered about the basic structure of the Universe was correct. The first page is titled H2O (water and ice)—the other three pages of evidence appear below it. It was a real eye-opener to find such a simple example of how quantum theory (QT) is wrong about the construction of matter using something as simple as water. This is the most compelling argument that I have found for not believing the SM explanations for the quantum. Yes, the SM is not just incomplete, it is actually wrong about some things. Not with its numerical answers, but with its explanations.

At present, there are four examples that I have provided information about, but I expect to find more. The first two proof pages contain findings worthy of front-page science news, as they are so contrary to what we have been taught that even those who are not interested in science might take note. The other two pages will show that there are equally believable explanations besides those of the SM for some aspects of the physical measurements of atomic matter. Currently, I am working on atoms and compounds to identify the sizes of atoms within those compounds. When it becomes clear to chemists that atoms are spherical (ball-bearing-like) entities that change size based on molecular combinations then a clearer picture will emerge for how exchange processes work. This will lead to a better understanding of how battery and fuel cell construction works, and for devising new techniques to improve them. After all, energy production and storage are two of the bigger problems the planet's population faces today. 

Caution, once you have read the evidence contained on this website, you will find it hard to deny that there is a better explanation of the Universe than that of quantum theory, as well as other parts of the SM. Einstein knew that there was a problem with the accepted view of the nature of the quantum, he just didn't have all of the information necessary to prove where things had gone wrong. Ultrawave theory provides that proof by presenting a completely physical picture of the quantum.

On the "UT vs SM" page, you will find information about recent news articles that can be presented somewhat differently using an ultrawave perspective. Most times I just give an alternative explanation, but occasionally I make predictions. One such prediction is that the Higgs boson does not exist (see page for further information about the proposed Higgs particle.)

[A special note about this website: The original file editor did not support subscript and superscript and I was not comfortable with the codes to include them; therefore, an up carot (^) for superscript is used. The exception being "The Constants" page, which required using alphabetic rather than numeric characters in the subscripts and superscripts. This necessitated uploading several pages of text as picture files making them look correct, but they cannot be edited on the site, which is why it was not done that way everywhere.]